Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169284 (ALL)

HARI PRAKASH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDU. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11512/2024 · 2025-02-21

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11288 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11512 of 2024 Petitioner :- Hari Prakash Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Edu. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Lalit Shukla Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Shri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.1 which may be directed to be decided with fixed time frame to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. 3. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a fresh representation before the respondent No.1 within a period of two weeks' from today then the respondent No.1 shall endeavour to decide the same within a further period of eight weeks by means of reasoned and speaking order on receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 21.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench