1IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12100 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.08.2025 Rajesh Kumar Patil. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner, being a pensioner himself, inter alia seeks directions to the respondents to calculate his family pension. Other reliefs are also prayed for in the writ petition. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently the petition has been formulated on the basis of documents supplied by the respondents. Some of the pleadings and the reliefs claimed are not legally permissible. Learned counsel, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. Prayer is accepted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 5th August, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)