Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16924 (RAJ)

AATAM SINGH S/O GULSHER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5626/2025 · 2025-06-06

Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22946] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5626/2025 Aatam Singh S/o Gulsher Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Barodamev, Police Station Barodamev, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. Amit Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 06/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.100/2025 registered at Police Station Barodamev, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits five litre of liquor recovered from petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been filed by Investigating Officer. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, since petitioner is in judicial custody since 29.03.2025 and conclusion of trial will take time, [2025:RJ-JP:22946] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5626/2025] this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner namely Aatam Singh S/o Gulsher Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J HEENA/65