Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16921 (AP)

U NAGESWARAMMA v. The state of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10045/2019 · 2025-09-24

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010227002019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10045/2019 Between: 1. U NAGESWARAMMA, U.NAGESWARAMMA, W/O. LATE U.PEDDA GIDDAIAH, AGED 60 YRS., OCCU SARPANCH, R/O. H.NO. 4-96, REMATA VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODUMUR POLICE STATION, KODUMUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDHAR, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, REMATA GRAMPANCHAYAT, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTIRCT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents for stopping of the further construction of Vuravakili in Remata Village of Kurnool Mandal is illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction of Vurivakili at Remata Village, Kurnool rural Mandal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10045 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents for stopping of the further construction of Vuravakili in Remata Village of Kurnool Mandal is illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction of Vurivakili at Remata Village, Kurnool rural Mandal Kurnool District…” 2. Sri T.Nikhilesh, learned counsel representing Sri Varun Byreddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 25.09.2025 JLV 4 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:10045 OF 2019 Date: 25.09.2025 JLV