Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16920 (GAU)

MD ATAUR RAHMAN v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/4480/2025 · 2025-09-02

Kalyan Rai Surana, Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010170272025 2025:GAU-AS:11896-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4480/2025 MD ATAUR RAHMAN S/O LT. ABDUL JALIL, R/O VILL SABASPUR, P.S. MURAJHAR, DISTRICT- HOJAI (ASSAM) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI- 1 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782435 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI P.O. AND DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782435 5:THE ASSAM STATE COORDINATOR OF NRC HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI -06 Page No.# 2/2 6:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NEW DELH Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, S BEGUM,SABRISH AHMED,MS A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 03.09.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Both sides are duly represented. Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the opinion of 2017 has been assailed, but he has forgot to give explanation to the delay in challenging the said opinion. Accordingly, on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant