HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 151 of 2025 Salman ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.972 of 2024, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/25(1-B) of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail; it is a no injury case. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 14.02.2025 Ravi Bisht