SHIVMURTI PATHAK AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. ROAD AND TRANSPORT MINISTRY OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY NEW DELHI AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/10296/2024 · 2025-01-22
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169166 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169166 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4235-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10296 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shivmurti Pathak And Another Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Road And Transport Ministry Of National Highway New Delhi And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Ambrish Rai Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Amrendra Kumar Mishra,C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Shiv Prasad Kushwaha, learned counsel for opposite party no. 3 as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. Learned Standing Counsel says that there is a dispute between the co-tenure holders with regard to the compensation payable in respect of the land which has been acquired. Accordingly, the compensation for the land has been deposited before the Presiding OfÏcer of the Land Acquisition Resettlement and Rehabilitation Authority.
3. This petition has been filed seeking compensation for the house, however, according to the report before the Special Land Acquisition OfÏcer, the private opposite parties herein also claim the house, and accordingly, compensation for the house has been paid to the private opposite parties, therefore, this is a disputed matter. Moreover, the award having been rendered, the petitioner can challenge the award, if so aggrieved.
4. We find merit in the submission of learned Standing Counsel. Accordingly, we dispose of this petition with liberty to pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench