Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169135 (ALL)

RAJRANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10262/2024 · 2025-01-22

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10262 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajrani Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Karan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Shri Aditya Mohan, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 5, which is taken on record. Shri Aditya Mohan, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 says that petitioner has filed a suit wherein a temporary injunction has been granted in her favour against the defendants therein, of which U.P. Jal Nigam is also a part. The aforesaid fact has not been disclosed in the present petition. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution but without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the pending suit. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench