Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16906 (JHR)

X v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6104/2025 · 2025-07-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:19956] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6104 of 2025 ------ Jitu Kumar, aged about 29 years, Son of Sanatan Saw, resident of Toklo Road near Vanvasi Kalyan Kendra, P.O. & P.S. Chakradharpur, District- Singhbhum (West) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Mahila P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.124 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 69, 115 (2), 351 (2), 352, 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has established physical relationship with the victim by adopting deceitful means of promising to marry her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the victim has solemnized marriage with the petitioner and was living with the petitioner as husband and wife but due to some family dispute, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.02.2025 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Singhbhum West at Chaibasa in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.124 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/