Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16904 (CHH)

DEVANAND PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2485/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2025:CGHC:17054 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2485 of 2025 1 - Devanand Patel S/o Shri Loachan Prasad Patel Aged About 43 Years R/o Village And Post Kotasura Block Pusaur District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 – Director, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Rural) Vikash Bhawan 1st Floor Sector - 19, North Block Atal Nagar Nawa Raiur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector, Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pusaur District - Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Kalicharan Yadav S/o Jagannath Yadav Wrorking As Awas Mitra/ Dedicated Human Resource Cluster No. 23 Cluster Kotasura Block SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.16 11:15:13 +0530 2 / 3 Pussore District - Raigarh (C.G.) R/o Village And Post Kotasura Block Pussore District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. J. K. Mahilang, Adv. alongwith Ms. Mahima Tandan, Adv. For Respondents/ State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 15/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the Respondent authorities to remove respondent No.6 from the post of Awas Mitra/ Dedicated Human Resource under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Rural) on the ground that the respondent No.6 has not disclosed some fact at the time of his recruitment. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has raised the grievance before the Collector vide Annexure P/5 as well as before the CEO, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh vide representation dated 07/10/2024. He submits that though the petitioner has raised his grievance before the respondent authorities, they are not taking any action on the representations submitted by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that if any representation has been filed by the petitioner, he may pursue the same before the concerned authorities and if the representations are still pending, the same may be considered by the authorities particularly by the CEO, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh. 3 / 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Looking to the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue his representation before the respondent No.4/ CEO, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh to take necessary action on the representation submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar