Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16902 (AP)

Smt.N.Geeta, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/30274/2016 · 2025-02-17

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010227462016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Smt.N.Geeta The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S D GOWD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 1551/S A QUDDUS 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus the proceedings in Rc 3rd respondent as illegal IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 30274/2016 ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: etition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.1046/2016C, dt.12.08.2016 of the respondent as illegal, arbitrary in violation of principles of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) etition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue appropriate writ or order or direction more declaring 2016 of the arbitrary in violation of principles of 2 W.P.No.30274 of 2016 natural justice and in violation of Article 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as fair price shop dealer in respect of shop No. 66, Kirikera village and Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders….” 02. In view of the death of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a notice was served on the petitioner through registered post and the acknowledgment was received. 03. Since no appearance has been made after receipt of the notice, the petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 17.02.2025 GRL 3 W.P.No.30274 of 2016 138 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 30274 of 2016 Date: 17.02.2025 GRL