Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16901 (PNJ)

SAMADH MAHANT BRAHAM SARUP DERA TALAB WALA, MEHLAN v. KULDEEP KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS

CR/7933/2018 · 2025-09-16

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-7933-2018 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (214) CR-7933-2018 Date of decision: - 16.09.2025 Samadh Mahant Braham Sarup Dera Talab Wala, Mehlan ....Petitioner Versus Kuldeep Kaur (deceased) through LRs and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 24.04.2023, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order: - “Present:- Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Notice issued for service of respondent No. 1(i) to (iii) received back with the report that they are not residing at the given address. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Dasti notices be given to him for service of LRs of respondent No. 1. Allowed. Be listed on 14.7.2023. 24.04.2023” 2. On 08.12.2023, time was sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the said order dated 24.04.2023. The order dated 08.12.2023 is reproduced herein-below: - “Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate, for NARESH KUMAR 2025.09.17 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-7933-2018 -2- Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ---- Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks some more time to comply with the order dated 24.04.2023 passed by this Court. He shall ascertain the correct address of the LRs of respondent No.1 and furnish the same in the Registry within two weeks. On doing so, notice be issued to the LRs of respondent No.1, for 02.05.2024. Dasti as well. December 08, 2023” 3. As per report of the Registry, till date the compliance has not been done. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present revision petition be disposed of, at this stage, but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the above-said orders. 5. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of, with the aforesaid liberty. ( VIKAS BAHL ) September 16, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.09.17 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement