[2025:RJ-JP:24692] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8462/2018 1. The Director, College Education, Rajasthan. 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Higher Education/college Education/Agriculture Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Shiv Chand, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Baba Bhagwan Das Government P.g. College, Chimanpura, Shahpura, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Dav College, Ajmer Through Its Secretary, Beawar Road, Ajmer. 3. The President, Dav College, Managing Committee, Chitrgupt Road, New Delhi. 4. Principal Dav College, Beawar Road, Ajmer. 5. Director Agriculture Department, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8375/2018 1. Director, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education/ College Education/ Agriculture, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Bajrang Singh S/o Shri Moti Singh, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Gram Devpura, Post Kharwa, Tehsil Masuda, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.) 2. The Management Committee, Dav College Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 3. The President, Dav College, Managing Committee, Chitrgupt Road, New Delhi. 4. The Principal , Dav College, Beawar Road, Ajmer. 5. The Director, Agriculture Department, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8444/2018 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus [2025:RJ-JP:24692] (2 of 4) [CW-8462/2018] 1. Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra S/o Late Ram Mohan Mishra, Aged About 59 Years, R/o E-233, Ram Smriti, Shastri Nagar, Ajmer-305006 Rajasthan 2. Managing Committee, Dav College, Through Its Secretary, Through Secretary, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Presdient Dav College Managing Committee, Chitragupt Road, New Delhi. 4. Principal , Dav College, Beawar Road, Ajmer. 5. Director, Agriculture Department, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16371/2018 The Director, College Education, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Tejpal Sharma S/o Shri Ganpat Lal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 165, New Chandra Nagar, Beawar Road, Ajmer (Raj.) 2. The Managing Committee, Dav College, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Raj.) 3. The President, Dav College, Managing Committee, Chitra Gupt Road, New Delhi 4. Principal, Dav College, Beawar Road, Ajmer 305001 (Raj.) 5. The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur 6. The Director, Agriculture Department, Rajasthan ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16412/2018 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Krishan Rao Parsai S/o Shri Purn Prasad Parsai, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 662/42, Near Post Office, Bhajan Gunj, Ajmer. 2. Managing Committee, Dav College, Through Its Secretary, Chitrgupt Road, New Delhi, 11005. 3. Dayanand College, Ajmer Through Its Principal, Beawar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG [2025:RJ-JP:24692] (3 of 4) [CW-8462/2018] For Respondent(s) : None Present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/07/2025 1. Required PF and notices have not been filed and the writ petitions are listed in the orders category, however, with consent of learned Additional Advocate General, the writ petitions have been considered on merits and would stand decided by this common order. 2. A common order passed by the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur, dated 12.05.2017, deciding various appeals filed by individual respondents- employees, is under challenge by and on behalf of petitioners comprising the Director, College Education, Rajasthan and the State of Rajasthan. 3. A perusal of order dated 12.05.2017 passed by the Tribunal, prima facie, goes to show that while issuing directions to pay the ACP and to revise pay scale, the amount has been directed to be paid by the Educational Institution and the State Government has been directed to ensure the compliance of the order. 4. It has been apprised that as on date no execution of the order by the respondents-employees have been filed against the petitioners. 5. In that view of the matter, petitioners may not be said to be aggrieved by the impugned judgment and the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. [2025:RJ-JP:24692] (4 of 4) [CW-8462/2018] 6. However, petitioners would be at liberty to assail the order impugned or any other consequential order in furtherance thereto, if respondents-employees initiate execution against petitioners. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /35, 36, 37, 41 & 42