Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16900 (CAL)

PARIMAL CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/7583/2024 · 2025-04-23

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ml 1920 rkd 23.04.2025 Ct.18 W.P.A. 7583 of 2024 Parimal Chakraborty -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Lalratan andal ….for the petitioner. Mr. Lal Mohan Basu ….for the State. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court is kept with the record. During course of hearing, learned advocate representing the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. Having considered the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars on the selfsame cause of action. Parties shall act on server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)