[2025:JHHC:29546] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1892 of 2019 ------ 1. Archna Burman, aged about 40 years, wife of Sanjay Kumar 2. Anil Burman, aged about 55 years, son of Late Nanhku Burman 3. Kanti Devi, aged about 50 years, wife of Anil Burman 4. Ritesh Burman, aged about 35 years, son of Anil Burman 5. Vikash Burman, aged about 30 years, son of Anil Burman All are residents of Village- Dimna Road, Hill View Colony, Phase-I, P.O. & P.S.- M.G.M., Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum 6. Manohar Burman @ M. L. Burman, aged about 57 years, son of Nanhku Burman, resident of Gurudwara Road, Mango, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum 7. Ashok Kumar Burman @ Ashok Burman, aged about 60 years, son of Motilal Burman, resident of Village- Dimna Road, P.O. & P.S.- Olidih, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sanjay Kumar, aged about 45 years, son of Jagdish Prasad Swarnkar, resident of Village – Taratand, Ward No.44, Jhumri Tilaiya, P.O. & P.S. – Tilaiya, District- Koderma … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-23-09-2025 Heard the learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 23.09.2025-Animesh/