ALOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8817/2024 · 2025-01-15
Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2512-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8817 of 2024 Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anuj Gupta,Ashish Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.4.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 7.11.2024 registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No.0298 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Indira Nagar, District Lucknow.
3. The Mediation and Conciliation Center, High Court, Lucknow has submitted its report dated 16.12.2024 along with the settlement entered into between the parties, whereby the parties have settled their dispute amicably.
4. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have settled their dispute amicably. They further agreed to withdraw the cases filed against each other including First Information Report dated 7.11.2024 registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No.0298 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Indira Nagar, District Lucknow.
5. Learned counsel for the parties state that even the amount under the said agreement stands settled between the parties and that there are no further claims or demands against each other with respect to the matter involved in the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for opposite party no.4 states that opposite party no.4 has received the entire compensation.
6. Considering the terms of settlement, we, accordingly, quash the FIR. All proceedings/investigation which may have been held consequent thereto are also quashed and the writ petition is allowed.
7. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the Court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
8. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer concerned. . [Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench