Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010169742025 2025:GAU-AS:13567 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/829/2025 SRI PRITAM SOVASARIA PROPRIETOR OF M/S PS ENTERPRISE SON OF LATE RADHE SHYAM SOVASARIA RESIDENT OF FLAT 4E BLOCK A 2 SUBHAM ELITE GANDHI BASTI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781003 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE GUWAHATI ZONAL UNIT HN 77 RUPKONWAR JYOTI PRASAD AGARWALA ROAD PANJABARI GUWAHATI 781027 2:THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE GUWAHATI ZONAL UNIT H N 77 RUPKONWAR JYOTI PRASAD AGARWALA ROAD PANJABARI GUWAHATI 3:THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER OFFICE OF DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE GUWAHATI ZONAL UNIT H N 77 RUPKONWAR JYOTI PRASAD AGARWALA ROAD PANJABARI GUWAHAT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHOUDHURY, MR. AMIT GOYAL Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GST, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 Heard Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. J.P More, learned Standing Counsel for CGST. 2. The applicant herein, namely, Aniket Sovasaria, is facing prosecution in connection with DGGI Case No. DGGI/INT/INTL/ 34/2025 and the proceeding is stated to be the stage of trial. 3. Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel for the Central GST, submits that as final complaint has been submitted before the learned Trial Court, perhaps the applicant can approach the said learned court as well. 4. The petitioner was granted bail by this Court on 08.05.2025, whereby several conditions were imposed. The condition (a) mentioned in paragraph 13 reads as follows – (a) Shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M),Guwahati without prior written permission from him/her. 5. Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, being a businessman who is required to travel to various places, including travel at short notice – is handicapped by this condition and therefore, seeks modification of the same. Page No.# 3/3 6. It is further submitted that he will continue to abide by all the other conditions, including any new conditions that may be imposed. 7. Upon considering the matter, I find force in the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant. Therefore, the said condition is hereby modified/cancelled and the bail conditions are hereby re- capitulated as follows – b) shall regularly attend the trial court and cooperate with the court for early disposal of the trial; c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court. d) shall not commit any such similar offence in future. 8. Needless to say that, violation of the bail conditions may entail cancellation of the bail. 9. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant