Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168950 (ALL)

INDAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

/10067/2024 · 2025-01-08

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1328-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10067 of 2024 Petitioner :- Indal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Roshan Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out. Counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. Learned Standing Counsel informs the Court that land of the petitioner is adjacent to the river and he had sown the crop which he has harvested. However, the petitioner had sown the crop on excess land, therefore, once the water of the river receded, the land was demarcated to the satisfaction of the petitioner in writing and it was found that he was in possession of excess land, but a false story has been cooked up in this petition. 3. Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench