APHC010227302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11407/2025 Between: Sri Shaik Meera Mohiddin, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11407/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in a nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action on the part of respondents in not acting upon the mee-seva application vide TATTA012400123499 dt.05.11.2024 and the representation of the petitioner for deleting from the prohibited list and make the necessary corrections of the measurement of the petitioner’s property to an extent of 541.58 Sq Yards (plots no.3, 4, 6) in Sy.No.1041/10C & Sy.No.1014/10B of Basinikonda Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal from the prohibitory list by considering the application of the petitioner submitted through E- Seva Application as illegal, Arbitrary and in violation of Article14, 21, & 300-A of the constitution of India and also contrary to G.O.Ms.No.575, dated 16.11.2018 and also the Order passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.NO.14768 of 2023, consequently direct the respondents to delete the petitioner’s land to an extent of 389.88 Sq.yards, (Plots 3 and 4) situated in Sy.No.1041/10B and to an extent of 151.67 Sq yards (Plot No.6) in Sy.No.1014/10C of Basinikonda Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal by acting upon the petitioner’s representation from the prohibitory list and make necessary corrections by incorporating the petitioners name in revenue records as per the measurements of the registered documents and pass such other order or orders….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the Mee-seva application dated 05.11.2024 submitted by the petitioner, requesting tot delete the subject properties of the petitioner from the list of prohibited properties under Section 22(1)(A() of the Registration Act, 1908. 4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner, if any, pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the application dated 05.11.2024, which is for deletion of entries against the petitioner’s subject properties from the list of Section 22(1)(C) of the prohibited properties, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 1 2004 (1) SCC 769 6. In the result, with the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the Mee-seva application dated 05.11.2024 submitted by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.05.2025 BSP 36 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.11407 of 2025 07.05.2025 BSP