1 APHC010226542019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10013/2019 Between: G.Muni Chandra Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of AP and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10013/2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 5th respondent in not extending the age of retirement of the petitioner from 58 years to 60 years as per the resolution No 2 dated 07.02.2019 of the Managing Committee and resolution No 5 dated 24.02.2019 of the General Body of the 5th Respondent Society as illegal arbitrary violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to G O Ms No 15 Agriculture and Cooperation (Coop III) Department dated 04.02.2019 and contrary to the provisions of section 115-D (2) (iv) of the APCS Act and consequently direct the respondents to raise the age of retirement of the petitioner from 58 years to 60 years as G.O.Ms. No. 15 Agriculture and Cooperation (Coop III) Department dated 04.02.2019 by continuing the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits till the petitioner attain the age of 60 years as per the resolution No.2 dated 07.02.2019 of the Managing Committee and resolution No.5 dated 24.02.2019 of the General Body of the 5th respondent Society and to pass …” 2. Heard Sri L.V.S Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents is in attendance. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since, the relief has become infructuous. No order as to Costs. 3 Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date:05.03.2025 UPS 4 16 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10013 of 2019 Dated.05.03.2025 UPS