Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16892 (GAU)

SAMSUL HAQUE and ORS v. FATIK ALI and ORS

RSA/138/2006 · 2025-01-26

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010169922006 2025:GAU-AS:872 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/138/2006 SAMSUL HAQUE and ORS S/O LATE SOBAN ALI. 2: 2. KALU MIAH S/O LATE SOBAN ALI 3: 3. SIDDIQUE ALI S/O SAMSUL HOQUE 4: 4. ROSHON ALI S/O YUSUB ALI 5: 5. SONTOSH ALI S/O ABDUL MANDAL 6: 6. BASATON W/O LATE INSAB ALI 7: 7. BASED ALI S/O LATE INSAB ALI 8: 8. JAIGAL S/O LATE INSAB ALI 9: 9. LAKHI KHATUN D/O LATE INSAB ALI 10: 10. MOYUSI KHATUN Page No.# 2/3 D/O LATE INSAB ALI ALL RESIDENT OF HATCHARA MOUZA-TITAPANI DIST - BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS FATIK ALI and ORS S/O REFATULLA, R/O HATCHARA, PO - CHANDMAMA, PS - BAGHBAR, DIST - BARPETA, ASSAM. 2:2. JAKATULLA S/O BASER ALI R/O VILL - HATCHARA P.O. CHANDMAMA PS - BAGHBAR DIST - BARPETA ASSAM For the Appellant(s) : None appears For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 27.01.2025 None appears on behalf of the appellants on call. 2. It is further seen that there is a direction issued by this Court on 08.01.2024 that the appellants should take fresh steps upon the respondents by way of registered post with A/D. However, even after a passage of 1 (one) year the appellants have not taken any steps. 3. It seems that the appellants have lost interest in the instant Page No.# 3/3 proceedings, for which, the instant appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant