IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.774 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Hari Om Sharma & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 23.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, enclosing therewith copy of communication dated 01.08.2025, addressed to the Deputy Director of School Education, Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that direction already stands issued to competent authority to decide the pending representations of the petitioners in light of judgment passed in Sanjay Kumar’s case. He states that in any eventuality, representation shall be decided within two weeks. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure that representation is decided within two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 25, 2025 (sunil)