DR RAVI ANAND AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/215/2025 · 2025-05-12
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78173 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 215 of 2025 Applicant :- Dr Ravi Anand And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brajesh Kumar Solanki,Samrat Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2057 of 2016, under Sections354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S.-Swaroop Nagar, District- Kanpur Nagar pending in the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 8, Kanpur Nagar expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case, which pertains to the year 2016. It is further submitted that it is a very old case but still pending at the stage of evidence. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest to decide the said case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It appears from perusal of the record that the matter is pending at the stage of recording the evidence under Section 246 Cr.P.C. of the complainant/ opposite party no.2 but for one and other false pretext she is avoiding the proceedings of the case. 6. Since the matter is very old, the Court concerned is directed to finish the evidence preferably within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, and thereafter within a period of three months the aforesaid complaint case must be decided finally, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 13.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad