Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16889 (RAJ)

SHRIRAM SON OF MAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/1072/2025 · 2025-06-27

Sudesh Bansal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1382/2025 Hanuman Singh Son Of Mohar Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Sahajpur Police Station Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur (Raj) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Kanji Meena Son Of Jagdish Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Chakeri Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1072/2025 Shriram Son Of Man Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Badh Nehri Polce Station Batoda District Sawai Madhopur (Raj) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Kanji Meena Son Of Jagdish Meena, Resident Of Chakeri Police Station Kundera District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.) Order 27/06/2025 1. Instant appeals have been filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on behalf of appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No.06/2025 at Police [2025:RJ-JP:23694] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1382/2025] Station Udai Mod, District Gangapur City for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(2) & 309(6) of BNS and Sections 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that information to the complainant/victim has already been sent. However, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. 3. Heard heard learned counsel for appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. It appears that appellants have been involved on account of an allegation of kidnapping of one Dilkhush and of snatching Rs.22,000/- from him; appellants are in custody since 12.04.2025; previous criminal antecedents of appellants are not of similar nature of offences but for other minor offences, however, without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that appellants deserves to be released on bail, subject to conditions. 5. Consequently, the instant appeals are allowed. The impugned orders dated 03.05.2025 & 21.04.2025 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST, (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan are set aside. It is ordered that accused-appellants Hanuman Singh S/o Mohar Singh & Shriram S/o Man Singh arrested in aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so, on following conditions:- [2025:RJ-JP:23694] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1382/2025] (i) that the appellants shall not repeat the similar nature of offence during bail granted by this Court and shall cooperate in the trial. (ii) that the appellants shall not tamper with and influence any of the prosecution witnesses; (iii) that appellants are directed to mark their attendance before the concerned Police Station i.e. Police Station- Udai Mod, District Gangapur City in the first week of every three months. (iv) that if the appellants commit breach of any of the conditions, the respondents shall be free to move application for bail cancellation of accused-appellants. (SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.)),J RONAK JAIMAN/88&89