UsiriKayala Madushudhan Goud, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/12894/2021 · 2025-07-06
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16889 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16889 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010226372021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12894 OF 2021 Between: UsiriKayala Madushudhan Goud, S/o. UsiriKayala Pullaiah, Age. 44 years, Occ: Agriculture and Business, R/o. 9-120, Govindapally, Sirivella, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 3. The Sub Collector, Nandhyal, Kurnool District. 4. The Tahsildasr, Nandhyal Mandal, Kurnool District. 5. The Commissioner, Nandhyal Municipality, Kurnool District. 6. The Assistant Engineer, APCPDCL, D3, Nandhyal, Kurnool District. 7. The Sub Registrar, Nandhyal, Kurnool District. 8. Donapati Nageshwara Reddy, S/o. Shiva Reddy, Age. 46 years, r/o H.No. 27-40B, Mulasagaram, Nandhyal town, Kurnool District. 9. Donapati Venkateshwara Reddy, S/o. Shiva Reddy, Age. 46 years, r/o 27- 48, Mulasagaram Nandhyal town, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERITIORARI calling for the records from the Office of Tahsildar, Nandhyal in Rc.B/280/2020 and to set aside the Order Dated. 3-9-2020 declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the provisions contained under the Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and has the effect of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner u/a 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Tahsildar, Nandhyal to set aside the entries in favour of the Respondent No.Sand 9 in respect of the land in Sy. No 324 extent of Ac. 1-88cents, Sy.No.326/1 extent Ac.1-34cents and Sy.No.326/2 extent Ac.4-16cents situated in the limits of Noonepally village, Nandhyal Mandal, and to incorporate the name of the petitioner in respect of the above lands. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 to 7 not to entertain any application and grant permissions to the Respondents No.8 and 9 to convert the land in Sy. No 324 extent of Ac.
1-88cents, Sy.No.326/1 extent Ac.1-34cents and Sy.No.326/2 extent Ac.4-16cents situated in the limits of Noonepally village, Nandhyal Mandal, into house plots and not to register the sale deeds presented by the Respondents No.8 and
9. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. B. SIDDARTH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 :GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI P. VENGALA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 & 9 : SRI M. BALASUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following order:
APHC010226372021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12894/2021 Between: 1.US1RIKAYALA MADUSHUDHAN GOUD USIRIKAYALAPULLAIAH, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/0 9-120, GOVINDAPALLY, SIRIVELLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. S/0 J 7 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3.THE SUB COLLECTOR, NANDHYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDASR, NANDHYAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.THE COMMISSIONER, NANDHYAL MUNICIPALITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, , APCPDCL, D3, NANDHYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7.THE SUBREGISTRAR, NANDHYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8.DONAPATI NAGESHWARA REDDY, S/0 SHIVA REDDY, AGE. 46 YEARS, R/0 H.NO. 27-40B, MULASAGARAM, NANDHYAL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9.DONAPATI VENKATESHWARA REDDY, S/0 SHIVA REDDY, AGE. 46 YEARS, R/0 27-48, MULASAGARAMNANDHYAL TOWN. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERITIORARI calling for the records from the Office of Tahsildar, Nandhyal in Rc.B/280/2020 and to set aside the Order Dated.
3-9-2020 declaring the illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the provisions contained under the Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and has the effect of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner u/a 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Tahsildar, Nandhyal to set aside the entries in favour of the Respondent No.8 and 9 in respect of the land in Sy. No 324 extent of Ac. 1-88cents, Sy.No.326/1 extent Ac.1-34cents and Sy.No.326/2 extent Ac.4-16cents situated in the limits of Noonepally village, Nandhyal Mandal, and to incorporate the name of the petitioner in respect of the above lands, and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 to 7 not to entertain any application and grant permissions to the Respondents No.8 and 9 to convert the land in Sy. No 324 extent of Ac.1-88 cents, Sy.No.326/1 extent Ac.1-34 cents and Sy.No.326/2 extent Ac.4-16cents situated in the limits of Noonepally village, Nandhyal Mandal, into house plots and not to register the sale deeds presented by the Respondents No.8 and 9, and pass more same as praying that in the 2
Counsel for the Petitioner: i 1.S1DDARTH C.B Counsel for the Respondent{S);
1 .VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.M BALASUBRAHMANYAM 3
The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner filed 03.07.2025 requesting permission of this Court a memo dated to withdraw the present writ petition. The memo dated 03.07.2025 is placed on record. 2. The request of the learned counsel for the accepted. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. petitioner is SD/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER TOneCCto Sri C. B. Siddarth,
2. One CC to Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC forAPSPDCL [OPUCl
3. Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] [oTti^^° ^ Registration, High Court of Andhra
5. One CC to Sri P. Vengala Reddy
6. One CC to Sri M.
7. Two CD Copies Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh SC for Municipality [OPUC] Balasubrahmanyam, Advocate [OPUC] Cnr
■% t HIGH COURT DATED:07/07/2025 Of ORDER WP NO. 12894 OF 2021 o jui a: m O^ Co ^ ^ Current Secnon ^ DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS