Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2500 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4424 of 2024 Applicant :- Alok Sen Roy Opposite Party :- Sri Prathamesh Kumar Vice Chairman L.D.A Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Kumar Agrawal,Himanshu Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. The respondent i.e. Shri Prathmesh Kumar, Vice Chairman, L.D.A, Lucknow, has filed an afÏdavit of compliance, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 27.02.2024, the representation of the applicant has been decided by order dated 14.01.2025, so now, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the decision taken by the respondent on the representation of the applicant is not a compliance of the judgment and order dated 27.02.2024 and there is a willful disobedience on the part of the applicant. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, going through the record of the case, it is apparent that the writ court by its judgment and order dated 27.02.2024 had directed respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the applicant by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. The relevant extract of the said judgment is quoted hereinbelow:- "7. In view thereof, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation to the respondent No.2- Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow also impleading the four persons, who have filed their impleadment application, annexing therewith a certified copy of this order as well as all other documents in support of their claim. In case such a representation is moved, the respondent No.2 shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law if possible within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him. Respondent No.2 shall do all the needful requirement in accordance with law. 8. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of." 5. After the perusal of the judgment and order dated 27.02.2024 and the compliance afÏdavit, whereby the representation of the applicant has been decided, this Court finds that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application as the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. 6. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench