Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16887 (HP)

SUSHIL SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./1106/2024 · 2025-01-03

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:365 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 1106 of 2024 Decided on : 03.01.2025 Sh. Sushil Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Arvind Negi, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this execution petition, the petitioner prays for execution of the judgment dated 07.05.2024, passed in CWP No. 5399 of 2023, titled Sh. Sushil Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors., which writ petition was disposed of by this Court by quashing the order of recovery passed against the petitioner 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:365 by the respondents, with further direction that no recovery be effected on the basis of the impugned communications. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition this Court had passed an order on 28.03.2024, in terms whereof respondents No.1 to 4 directed to release gratuity in favour of the petitioner, in case there was no legal impediment in the payment thereof. 3. This Court is of the considered view that this order passed on 28.03.2024, has now merged with the final judgment pronounced on 07.05.2024. Execution can be of the final judgment only. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General apprises the Court that as per his instructions, everything that was due to the petitioner, already stands paid. 5. Faced with this situation, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be granted to the petitioner that if there is any surviving grievance, he may approach the Court again by way of a writ petition. 6. In view of the prayer so made, these proceedings are closed, with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous 3 2025:HHC:365 application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 03, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)