NIKHAT PRAVEEN AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10444/2024 · 2025-08-06
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45909 Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10444 of 2024 Applicant :- Nikhat Praveen And 7 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Vardhan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rohit Tripathi Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Jai Vardhan Srivastava, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A., for the State as well as perused the record.
2. Instant application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 7301 of 2024( State Vs. Nikhat Parveen and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 10/2024, under Sections 34, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki.
3. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 08.1.2025 has passed the following order in this case:
“In compliance of order of this Court, the applicant no.1 and the opposite party no. 2 are present before this Court, who have been identified by their respective counsel. Heard. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and that dispute between the parties, as appears is related to matrimonial dispute and can be settled amicably by way of mediation, let the matter be placed before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on
27.01.2025. List/put up this case before this Court on 04.03.2025 as fresh along with mediation report.
2 Till the next date of listing, the proceedings in issue against the applicants shall be kept in abeyance. ”
4.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, the case was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. Thereafter, the mediation proceedings completed, and a settlement agreement was entered into between the parties on 04.03.2025. The parties as well the Mediator have put their signatures on the settlement agreement.
5. Thus, learned counsel for the applicants as well the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submit that they have no objection, if the proceedings referred in 7 of the settlement agreement dated 04.03.2025 are quashed and the application is allowed.
6. Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have submitted that since the parties have settled their dispute through the process of mediation, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further.
7. In view of the statement/agreement made by the applicant as well as opposite party no.2 and keeping in view the nature and gravity and the severity of the offence which are more particularly is private dispute and differences and meet to the ends of justice, the present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed and the entire proceedings of Case No. 7301 of 2024( State Vs. Nikhat Parveen and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 10/2024, under Sections 34, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki are hereby quashed.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Arvind (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench