SHYAM LAL @ SHYAM LAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. AWAS EVAM SHAHRI NIYOJAN VIBHAG U.P. LKO.
WPIL/981/2024 · 2025-08-14
Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47584-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 981 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shyam Lal @ Shyam Lal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Awas Evam Shahri Niyojan Vibhag U.P. Lko. Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalla Ji Maurya,Ayush Singh,Prabhat Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brijesh Kumar,Rakshit Raj Singh,Ratnesh Chandra,Suresh Kumar Srivastava,Utkarsh Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
1. The instant writ petition in the form of a public interest litigation has been filed seeking therein the following relief:-
"i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opposite parties no.2 and 3 for preventing the illegal construction as building situated at Mohalla Campwell Road, Ram Nagar, Balaganj near Paras Lawn, Police Station Saadatganj, District Lucknow and seal it in pursuance of order dated 13.08.2024, in the nature of justice."
2. Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for opposite party nos.2 and 3 submits that pursuant to the order dated 07.06.2022, the building in question had already been sealed on
27.11.2024.
3. Sri. Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for opposite party nos.5 and 6 submits that he will contest the matter before the concerned authority in respect of the sealing of the building. He further submits that during pendency of the proceedings before the Lucknow Development Authority, no further construction shall be raised in the building in question.
4. In view of aforesaid statement given by Sri. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 and opposite party nos.5 and 6, nothing remains to be decided in this petition.
5. In the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 14.8.2025
Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench