Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168816 (ALL)

C/M MAA VINDHYAWASINI SHIKSHAN SEVA TRUST THRU. CHIEF TRUSTEE MRS. POONAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF TECHNICAL EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9964/2025 · 2025-10-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9964 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Satyendra Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Shri S.M. Singh Rayekwar, the learned counsel for the Pharmacy Council of India and Shri D.K. Singh Chauhan, the learned counsel for the Joint Entrance Examination Council (Polytechnic), U.P. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the U.P. Board of Technical Education and Joint Entrance Examination Council to include the petitioner's Institution in the third round of counseling of D.Pharma courses for the academic year 2025-26. 3. It has been stated in the writ petition that the Pharmacy Council of India has already been granted approval to the petitioner's Institution for running D.Pharma courses during the session 2025- 26. 4. On the basis of written instructions provided by the Secretary, Technical Education Council, the learned counsel for the respondents have informed the Court that the Council has taken a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh, Satyendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., D.K. Singh Chauhan, S M Singh Royekwar C/M Maa Vindhyawasini Shikshan Seva Trust Thru. Chief Trustee Mrs. Poonam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) decision on 09.10.2025 whereby 101 Institutions, including the petitioner's Institute, has been included in their third round of counseling. 5. Accordingly, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and the writ petition has become infructuous. 6. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 10, 2025 -Amit K- WRIC No. 9964 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench