IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9512 of 2025 Decided on: 6th June, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pawan Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3, which is waived by Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel. 2. In the given facts and circumstances, neither reply is required to be called from the appearing respondents nor notice is required to be issued to respondent No.4. 3. Petitioner is serving as Inspector in the respondent-Corporation. His grievance is to the office order dated 30.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), whereunder, he has been 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 transferred from Palampur to Sarkaghat. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits that the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at the present place of posting. He, however, submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation to respondent No.1 on 01.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) for his suitable adjustment in view of certain adverse family circumstances faced by him. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to decide his aforesaid representation within a time bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without interfering with the transfer of respondent No.4 under the impugned office order to the place of posting of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.1/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 01.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within a period of ten days from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 06, 2025 Judge Mukesh