Md Sirazuddin v. Officer In charge, Mayang Imphal Police Station
AB/28/2024 · 2025-05-08
A Guneshwar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1688 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1688 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No. 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
AB No. 28 of 2024
Md. Sirazuddin and Anr. … Petitioners - Versus -
Officer in Charge, Mayang Imphal Police Station … Respondent B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
ORDER 09.05.2025
[1] Present Mr. N. Jotendro, learned sr. counsel assisted by Mr. Abdul Baqee Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Y. Ashang, learned PP assisted by Mr. Phungyo Zinkhai, learned Dy. GA for the respondent. [2] It is submitted that during the pendency of the present application, the complainant and the petitioners herein, who are the accused in the FIR No. 28(7) 2024 MI-PS U/s 447/325/324/506/120-B/34 IPC have entered into a memorandum of understanding (MoU) dated 02.12.2024 and thereby settled the dispute between the parties with undertake to withdraw the case. [3] A copy of the MoU dated 02.12.2024 entered in the Office of Meitei Pangal Council Manipur (MPCM) is taken on record. [4] It is submitted that in terms of the amicable settlement made between the parties, the present bail application may be disposed of. [5] On the other hand, the learned PP for the respondent submits that in terms of the MoU dated 02.12.2025, both parties agreed to withdraw the case OINAM THOIB A MEITEI Digitally signed by OINAM THOIBA MEITEI Date: 2025.05.12 11:57:20 +05'30'
and the matter has become infructuous as there is no apprehension of being arrest in the FIR case. [6] Accordingly, the present AB No. 28 of 2024 is closed as infructuous. [7] Interim order, if any, is merged with the final order.
JUDGE
Thoiba