Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168730 (ALL)

SMT.MANJU BHANDARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. EXCISE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/9949/2025 · 2025-10-10

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9949 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has assailed the demand notice cum citation of Rs.2,70,034.38/- plus processing fee dated 28.08.2025 issued by the respondent no.7. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liquor shop was never allotted to the petitioner. 4. This submission has been controverted by learned counsel for the respondents, who has indicated that the petitioner had participated in the tender process and had also been allotted a particular shop. 5. In light of the above, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation before the authority concerned in accordance with law. If such an application is moved, the same shall be decided in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of such application. October 10, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.K.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt.Manju Bhandari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Excise Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench