SANJAY NIGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1133/2025 · 2025-10-10
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168729 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168729 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1133 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in relation to FIR/Case Crime No.0045/2021, under Sections 409, 420, 34, 120-B of I.P.C., at Police Station - Kaiserbagh, District -Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Applicant is not named in the F.I.R. It is submitted that the applicant is the proprietor of the Firm i.e. M/s Sai Kripa Trading Corporation which had done the civil work allotted to it. It is also submitted that although the Firm of the applicant had done the work allotted but the full payments have not been made till date despite passing of an order by this Court dated 30.09.2022 in Writ-C No.6920 of 2022. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the co-accused Ram Kumar and Kishore Kumar Sharma have been granted protection by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 15.09.2025 and 18.09.2025, passed in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No.1014 of 2025 and Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No.1044 of 2025 whereby the application(s) have been allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sabita Lahiri, Vijai Krishna Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjay Nigam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant stands on the similar footing, therefore, the applicant is entitled for the same benefit. 5. Taking note of the aforesaid, this Court finds that the applicant is entitled to protection. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 6.
Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the accused- applicant - Sanjay Nigam be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime number on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Station House Officer of the Police Station/Court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) That the accused-applicants shall make himself available for interrogation by police authorities as and when required and will cooperate with the investigation; (ii) That the accused-applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; and (iii) That the accused-applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 10, 2025 ML/- ABAIL No. 1133 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench