DASRATH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY THRU.CHAIRMAN,GYANENDRA YADAV AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP THRU.ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF TECHNICAL EDU. GOVT OF UP LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9932/2025 · 2025-10-10
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9932 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Shri S.M. Singh Rayekwar, the learned counsel for the Pharmacy Council of India and Shri D.K. Singh Chauhan, the learned counsel for the Joint Entrance Examination Council (Polytechnic), U.P.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the U.P. Board of Technical Education and Joint Entrance Examination Council to include the petitioners' Institution in the third round of counseling of D.Pharma. courses for the academic year 2025-26.
3. It has been stated in the writ petition that the Pharmacy Council of India has already been granted approval to the petitioners' Institution for running D.Pharma. courses during the session 2025-
26.
4. On the basis of written instructions provided by the Secretary, Technical Education Council, the learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh, Puttan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., D.K. Singh Chauhan, S M Singh Royekwar Dasrath College Of Pharmacy Thru.Chairman,Gyanendra Yadav And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up Thru.Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Edu. Govt Of Up Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondents have informed the Court that the Council has taken a decision on 09.10.2025 whereby 101 Institutions, including the petitioners' Institute, has been included in their third round of counseling.
5. Accordingly, the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed and the writ petition has become infructuous.
6. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 10, 2025 -Amit K- WRIC No. 9932 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench