ZUHAIB AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ ADDL. CHIEF SECY. THRU. GOVT. (DEPTT. BASIC EDU.) AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10654/2024 · 2025-02-20
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168721 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168721 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11044 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10654 of 2024 Petitioner :- Zuhaib Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Thru. Govt. (Deptt. Basic Edu.) And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Farhat Jamal Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shailendra Singh Rajawat Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 and Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.3 which may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 20.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench