Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16872 (UTT)

MS SINGHAL BROTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3278/2025 · 2025-11-28

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:10615 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 3 2 7 8 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J 1. Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 4. Petitioner has challenged order dated 02.09.2024 passed by Secretary, Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Ramnagar, whereby his licence was cancelled. He has also challenged order dated 25.08.2025 passed by Managing Director, Agricultural Produce Marketing Board, Rudrapur. The order of cancellation of allotment of shop has also been challenged by the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of dispute between partners of petitioner firm, the shop remained closed for some time and this is the reason for cancellation of licence as well as allotment of shop. He submits that the differences between partners have now been resolved, therefore, petitioner be permitted to make representation seeking revocation of the order of cancellation of licence and allotment of shop. 6. Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 assures the Court that if petitioner makes 2025:UHC:10615 representation within two weeks, the same shall be decided, as per law. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to respondent no. 2. If such representation is made within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken sympathetically, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. It shall be open to respondent no. 2 to impose any condition, if he decides to revoke the orders impugned in this writ petition, in the interest of Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee. Till decision is taken on the representation, the shop in question shall not be allotted to any other person. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J) 28.11.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d 1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4 610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.11.28 04:22:08 -08'00' 2025:UHC:10615