Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:29218 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Petition No.1626 of 2025
Decided on: 29th August, 2025
Krishan Chand
.......Petitioner
versus
State of H.P and others
...Respondents
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Dy. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Instructions have been placed on record, according to which, a reasoned order has been passed by the Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Kangra on 01.08.2025 in compliance to order dated 26.03.2025 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Thus, order has been complied with and no further order can be passed in the execution petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the consideration
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
( 2025:HHC:29218 ) 2
order dated 01.08.2025 passed by the Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Kangra in accordance with law, if so advised. August 29, 2025
( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen)
Judge