APHC010226832008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION N Between: Siddhardha Constructions Pvt. Ltd., having its Corporate Office at 1 8-865/ 14/3RT, Sree Nilayam, Prakasham Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad – 500 016, Rep. by its Managing Director Sri Babu. AND Assistant Commissioner of Division – 1, Visakhapatnam, and another Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent This Court delivered the following At the time of considering the matter, Mr.Viswanath Challa counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development, the subject matter in this writ petition has become infructuous. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7158 of 2008 Siddhardha Constructions Pvt. Ltd., having its Corporate Office at 1 865/ 14/3RT, Sree Nilayam, Prakasham Nagar, Begumpet, 500 016, Rep. by its Managing Director Sri N.Surendra ...Petitioner Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, 1, Visakhapatnam, and another. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.S.Chakrapani Counsel for the Respondents: Ms.Santhi Chandra, S.C. for C.B.I.C., This Court delivered the following ORDER: (per NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, Mr.Viswanath Challa counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development, the subject matter in this writ petition has [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Siddhardha Constructions Pvt. Ltd., having its Corporate Office at 1- 865/ 14/3RT, Sree Nilayam, Prakasham Nagar, Begumpet, N.Surendra Petitioner Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Respondents At the time of considering the matter, Mr.Viswanath Challa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development, the subject matter in this writ petition has 2 2. In the light of the above stated position, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ____________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J July 25, 2025 vasu