ASHISH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS
BAIL/9682/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9682 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.67 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 351(3) BNS, 5(j)(ii)/6 POCSO Act. P.S. Hathigawan, District Pratapgarh.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement under section 183 BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution version.
4. It is stated that both of them have married, and the victim is also pregnant and is also staying with the applicant's family.
5. Considering the statement under section 183 BNSS, a case for bail is made out. The applicant, who is in custody since 23/4/25 and has no criminal history, is entitled to bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ashish Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anamika Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashish Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 9682 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench