Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168651 (ALL)

ANKUSH YADAV v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. / PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8599/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8599 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Manish Pandey, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 25.04.2023 as well as summoning order dated 17.06.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 60077 of 2025 arising out of F.I.R. No. 139 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow as well as its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 22.08.2025 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 6858 of 2025, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed. 5. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide order dated 06.09.2025. The compromise deed is appended as Annexure 4 to the application, which goes to show that respondent no. 2 does not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankush Yadav .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) want to prosecute the applicant. 6. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. 10. Charge sheet dated 25.04.2023 as well as summoning order dated 17.06.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 60077 of 2025 arising out of F.I.R. No. 139 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow as well as its entire proceedings are hereby quashed. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. October 9, 2025 VKS A482 No. 8599 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench