DEVENDRA SAO ALIAS DEVENDRA KUMAR SAW ALIAS DEVENDAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5433/2025 · 2025-07-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16864 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16864 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:18158 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5433 of 2025
------ Devendra Sao @ Devendra Kumar Saw @ Devendar Saw, aged about 20 years, S/o Thambhi Saw, R/o Village-Jitkundi, Post + P.S.-Birni, District-Giridih.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07-07-2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under section 103(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder of deceased Etwari Saw. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of suspicion. It is next submitted that as per the post-mortem report, the cause of death was excessive bleeding due to poly trauma injury (due to RTA i.e. Road Traffic Accident). It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para- 14 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.03.2025 as is evident from para-21 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/