VISHAL BHARTI @ VISHAL CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
BAIL/9692/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9692 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.115 of 2025 under section 137(2), 87, 64(1) BNS and section 5(j)(ii)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Sampurna Nagar, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the applicant had enticed the daughter of the informant. Subsequently, the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that both of them have married. The medical on record demonstrates that the victim is pregnant also. The tentative age of the victim is seventeen years.
4. Considering the statements of the victim and the fact that both of them have married, the applicant who is in custody since 01.07.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Vishal Bharti @ Vishal Chaudhary be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Prakash Singh, Shailendra Singh, Vivek Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vishal Bharti @ Vishal Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 9692 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench