HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11944 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the present petitioner is identical to the case of one Km. Neetu,who has already approached this court by way of instituting Writ A No. 3115 of 2025, wherein the coordinate Bench of this court has passed the order on 24-03-2025. He further submits that the present petitioner is also entitled for the same relief, as was granted to Km. Neetu. Learned counsel for the opposite parties do not dispute the aforesaid contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, and the copy of the Government Order dated 11.11.2019 which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in the light of Government Order dated 11.11.2019, if the same is applicable upon the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma, Rajesh Kumar Singh Akila .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. October 9, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 11944 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench