ANUPAMA RAI MEMORIAL COLLEGE OF PHARMACY THRU. SECY. AMIT RAI AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF TECH. EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9876/2025 · 2025-09-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9876 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rahul Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2, Ms. Shubhangi Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.M. Singh Royekwar, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 and Sri D.K. Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 2. Present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Board of Technical Education, Uttar Pradesh & Joint Entrance Examination Council (Polytechnic) Uttar Pradesh, to include the name of the petitioner's institution in the 2nd round of the counseling of D Pharma Course for the academic session 2025-26 as all the petitioners are existing institutions have been granted approval by the Pharmacy Council of India, New Delhi for academic session 2025-26, in the interest of justice. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Board of Technical Education, Uttar Pradesh & Joint Entrance Examination Council (Polytechnic) Uttar Pradesh, to extend the benefit of the judgment and order dated 19.08.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ C No. 7273 of 2025, in the interest of justice. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., D.K. Singh Chauhan, S M Singh Royekwar Anupama Rai Memorial College Of Pharmacy Thru. Secy. Amit Rai And 2 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Tech. Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
(iii) To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iv) To award the cost of this petition in favour of the petitioners."
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that the petitioner was granted approval for running the D Pharma Course for the academic session 2025-26 by the Pharmacy Council of India, however, the affiliation has not been considered by respondent no. 2. 4.
This Court had considered and passed the order in the matter, which is similar to the present petition being Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025 vide judgment and order dated 19.08.2025, considering the fact that the petitioner has already been granted approval by the P.C.I., the respondent no. 2 is directed to consider the application for the petitioner for grant of affiliation in the light of directions given by this Court in Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025, within the time as has been fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Parshavanath Charitable Trust & Others Vs. All India Council for Technical Education & Others (Civil Appeal No. 9048 of 2012). 5. Subject to aforesaid directions present petition stands disposed of. September 28, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 9876 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench