HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9575 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.93 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Harpalpur, District Hardoi. 3. The submission of the Counsel for the applicant is that the general allegations were levelled as is evident from the FIR. It is also alleged that the deceased was thrown from the terrace and one of Umashanker who tried to intervene, was hit by the bricks, which resulted into death. He further argues that subsequently, one Pramod confessed that he hit the deceased with bricks. With regard to the other, it is stated that general allegations were levelled against all the accused, who are seven in numbers and on the same allegation, the co-accused have been enlarged on bail vide order dated 02.07.2025. Although the applicant does not claim parity with the co-accused, who are ladies, however, the facts remain that there are general allegations against the applicant, the role of the applicant is distinct from the co-accused Pramod who has confessed. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the allegations to be general in nature; the applicant is in custody since 16.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, I am of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rohit be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9575 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench