SMT. SEEMA MISHRA v. SIR ANAND PRAKASH RAI NAIB TAHSILDAR TEHSIL MILKIPUR DISTT. AYODHYA U.P.
CAPL/4411/2024 · 2025-01-15
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2488 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4411 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Seema Mishra Opposite Party :- Sir Anand Prakash Rai Naib Tahsildar Tehsil Milkipur Distt. Ayodhya U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Tiwari,Kunj Bihari Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. The respondent has filed an afÏdavit of compliance, which is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order dated 09.11.2023, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 (Smt. Seema versus State of U.P and others) has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
3. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench