Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168550 (ALL)

ROSHAN LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/9577/2025 · 2025-10-09

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9577 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Instant bail application has been filed by the applicants in Case Crime No. 241of 2025 under Sections- 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109 B.N.S, P.S.- Mailani, District- Kheri, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. It is stated that co-accused person, namely, Janki Prasad has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9443 of 2025. Copy of bail order of co-accused Janki Prasad placed before this Court is taken on record. In these circumstances, the applicants are also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicants, however, he could not dispute the above contention made by the applicants' counsel. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and going through the contents of the application, F.I.R., as well as other relevant documents and also taking note of the fact that co-accused Janki Prasad has already been released on bail and also that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roshan Lal And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) the applicants have no criminal history and without going into the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the application has substance and it is accordingly, allowed on the ground of parity. 6. Let applicant- Roshan Lal and Mukesh, be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on their furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of the court concerned forthwith. Applicants are also directed to furnish two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (1) Applicants will not try to influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence of the case or otherwise misuse the liberty of bail. (2) Applicants will fully cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when witnesses are present in the Court. (3) Applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. (4) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. (5) The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned. (6) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. 7. Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail. October 9, 2025 Preeti BAIL No. 9577 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench