ROHIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1464/2025 · 2025-10-09
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1464 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the summoning order dated 04.07.2025 and charge-sheet dated 11.09.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 312 of 2024 u/s 126(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Krishna Nagar, District- Lucknow."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that vide order dated 05.08.2025, a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 15.09.2025. 5. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Triloki Nath Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The summoning order dated 04.07.2025 and charge-sheet dated 11.09.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 312 of 2024 u/s 126(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Krishna Nagar, District- Lucknow including entire proceedings in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed. 9.
Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. October 9, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1464 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench