HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9958 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent(s) in deciding the representation/application dated 10.09.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that for raising their grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2/ District Magistrate, Pratapgarh should be directed to pass a reasoned order on the representation/application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Pratapgarh is directed to pass a reasoned order on the aforesaid representation/application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today after granting an opportunity of hearing to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwakar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Yogendra Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt.Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 10, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 9958 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench